Now this is
some very interesting stuff.
The investigation sent the Clinton campaign reeling in at least
two pivotal points during the campaign — less than two weeks
before Election Day, when FBI director James Comey
announced the bureau was looking into new emails related to
the Clinton inquiry,
and again two days before the election, when he announced the
agency found nothing.
The cumulative effect was seen as having done irreparable damage
to Clinton's already battered second bid for the White House and
the Clinton camp later
blamed Comey himself for their loss to Donald Trump.
The campaign was far from "battered" if you believed anything that MSM put out right before the election. Even Fox News
had her up by 6 points as late as Oct 18th. We were told
she was a lock to win by many different sources.
But Democrats said Trump’s appearances in states where he is clearly
behind are simply a sign that his other pathways to 270 electoral votes
have narrowed to virtually nothing — even before the FBI announcement in
her favor.
If things were "narrowing to virtually nothing" for the Trump Campaign how can her campaign be "battered?" I even remember
talk of a Democrat sweep that put markets on edge.
While Trump's troubles could pull support away from other
Republican candidates, voters may also opt to pull the lever for Trump
and ignore those who are not supporting him, said Pethokoukis, who is
also a CNBC contributor.
Now Democrats "are talking
about a clean sweep and being able to re-run the first term of Obama the
way they would have liked to have done if it wasn't overshadowed by the
financial crisis," he said.
Oh how wrong all of these people were.
No comments:
Post a Comment