The tax cuts that won committee approval included a $500 credit for workers making up to $75,000 per year. Couples with incomes up to $150,000 a year would receive a $1,000 credit. Individuals with incomes up to $100,000 and couples earning up to $200,000 would qualify for lesser tax breaks.
The Republican alternative envisioned a different approach.
It called for reducing the current 10 percent bracket to 5 percent, affecting a taxpayer's first $8,350 in income, and lowering the existing 15 percent bracket to 10 percent, covering income from $8,351 to $33,950.
So instead of getting a measly $500 tax cut the GOP plan would give a middle class person making $30,000 a year a $1650 tax cut right off the bat. That is $137 a month in savings which could mean a whole week worth of groceries extra per month. The Dem plan gives you just $41.66 a month which is not enough to take a family to the movies.
The Dem plan is only better for people making less then $8350 a year because it gives them an extra an $83 worth of tax breaks per year. That comes out to a measly $6.91 a month which is less then an Arby's value meal.
What the GOP plan needs to do is that if you are making $8350 a year you should be put into a 0% tax bracket because how much money could the government be making from people making such low wages?
So the GOP can say that poor people would get a full $869 per year more under their plan. Then the Dems would not be able to parrot "tax cuts for the wealthy" when the poor would be get back $835 a year under their plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment